[Imc-aotearoa-ed] and then again . . .

[imc-aotearoa-ed@lists.indymedia.org]

Sounds good. Our main problem at present is people who are using 
AIMC's open publishing as 'therapy', at the expense of other people.  
Ken

On 26 Aug 2002 at 16:08, finn c. wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> Maybe it's time to revise (in a very low key way) our ed policy. For instance this may be a wise thing to put in:
> 
> - Posts which are obviously incorrect or misleading. This includes attempts to spread disinformation or to impersonate another individual.
> 
> I really like the Melbourne ed pol:
> 
> Probs requiring notification:
> 
> - Posts the author has requested hidden.
> - Posts which are obviously incorrect or misleading. This includes attempts to spread disinformation or to impersonate another individual.
> - Posts that incite violence against disempowered members of the community
> - Posts which use language, imagery, or other forms of communication whose sole purpose is to promote racism, fascism, xenophobia, homophobia, sexism, able-ism, ageism or any other form of discrimination.
> - Persistent nuisance posts to the newswire or comments sections.
> - Posts that are deemed to be devoid of content or analysis and appear to be published with the sole purpose of disruption.
> 
> What do ppl think about this? We do need a process doc first though eh.
> 
> finn
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Imc-aotearoa-ed mailing list
> Imc-aotearoa-ed@lists.indymedia.org
> http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/imc-aotearoa-ed
>