[Imc-aotearoa-ed] Re: PROPOSAL: ed policy amendment [banning]

[mr sterile]

yep here, thanks for writting it finn
since we've mention 3, 6 and indefinite time frame, do we want them imposed
on that sliding scale, if you fuck up after 3 months, 6 months become the
next banning time frame, and then after that indefinitely.
hows that sound??
kieran


> Kia ora,
>
> Looks OK. Maybe needs something spelling out how the ban
> is implemented?
>
> RnB,
> Strypey
>
> Quoting ksimpson at ihug.co.nz:
>
> > Yes from me. Ken
> >
> > On 26 Jan 2004 at 23:27, finn c. wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Here's an amendment for the ed policy
> > > [http://indymedia.org.nz/edpolicy.php3] - we should
> > really agree to this
> > > before we ban anyone .. It should be pretty straight
> > forward, but check
> > > it for typos as I'm quite sleepy :)
> > >
> > > seeya's
> > > finn
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > D. Banning authors
> > >
> > > In extreme circumstances the Editorial Collective may
> > ban authors from
> > > publishing. This action is only taken when the
> > Editorial Collective has
> > > exhausted all other methods to deal with a problem
> > spammer, and they are
> > > causing significant disruption on the newswire. Only
> > designated spammers
> > > may be banned.
> > >
> > > An author may be banned for 3 months, 6 months or
> > indefinitely. This can
> > > revoked at any time when consensus is reached by the
> > collective.
> > >
> > > Process for banning an author:
> > >
> > > 1.An empowered editor proposes to the Editorial
> > Collective that the
> > > author be banned from publishing, and outlines the
> > reasons
> > > for banning. The proposal should also include a
> > duration for banning.
> > >
> > > 2.The Editorial Collective reaches consensus, deciding
> > that all other
> > > avenues have been exhausted.
> > >
> > > 3.A further proposal is sent to the general Aotearoa
> > IMC list by the
> > > Editorial Collective, outlining why the author should
> > be banned and what
> > > actions the Editorial Collective has taken previously
> > to mitigate the
> > > disruption caused by the author.
> > >
> > > 4.When consensus is reached, a member of the Editorial
> > Collective emails
> > > the author informing them that they have been banned,
> > the reason and the
> > > duration.  5.The Editorial Collective notes the
> > duration and the date
> > > the author was banned on the SpammerList wiki page.
>
> --
> "What does any man with power want? More power."
> - The Oracle, Matrix: Reloaded
>
> Te Komako Motuhake
> http://aotearoa.indymedia.org/
> _______________________________________________
> Imc-aotearoa-ed mailing list
> Imc-aotearoa-ed at lists.indymedia.org
> http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/imc-aotearoa-ed
>