[Imc-aotearoa-ed] discussion required

[mr sterile]

I dont know about designating the NF group as a spammer, surely we need to
continue to approach it on an individual basis, they dont seem to have any
sort of staying power compared to other spammers,
perhaps a slight alteration to the ed policy in which if a article is
attracting a flurry of that sort of activity (i.e. racist, sexist etc) we
can invoke that those posts can be removed without prior discussion but then
inform the list after.
This could be applied for a given period of time i.e. 7 days and then
revoked back to these posts requiring discussion before being hidden, unless
the editorial alteration be re-invoked.
It seemed to work well when we did with the first lot of NF posts.
it would be a shame to hide them all, as they do make themselves look
particularly silly which can only be a good thing
just some thoughts
kieran


> Hi. I think the NF are heading that way. However, editorial
> policy requires us to vet each post for racism, sexism etc.
> which could be a lot of work with these guys when they get
> going. Ken
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm unsure what we are doing about these nazi posts, so
> > I've put this up for discussion. Perhaps we should
> > designate NF type posts as official spammers?
> >
> > seeya,
> > finn