[IMC-bristol] bristol indymedia nights at the cube: dec onwards

[Kyra]

think there must've been crossed wires between ian/tom at the cube; i 
just saw the programme for december and there's no indymedia night 
scheduled - the programmes are already printed now so not poss to amend.

as of this week though, i am helping with programming at the cube so in 
future shall be able to ensure we get on to the programme and can make 
sure the copy gets there.
i've booked monday 26th jan as agreed at last b-imc meeting - i suppose 
that the programme below shall be our january edition now?

can i suggest a meeting on wed 3rd dec to discuss future programming 
ideas for both the cube and hat and feather film nights
who else would like to work on this - and then we can set a meeting place

kyrax

ian wrote:

> Let me know asap how you get on with pinning down Julia Guest's film - 
> otherwise i'll pass this copy on to Cube...
>
> best
> ian
>
> ==================================================================================
>
> Title  Indymedia filmnights
>
> Body of text - An ongoing showcase of contemporary filmmakers who are 
> finding
> new forms of cinema to show resistance to globalization throughout the 
> world. 
>
> Tonights line up includes a short community film from the EASTON 
> COMMUNITY
> ASSOCIATION, the POPSTAR LIBERATION FRONT's film on the local Hardcore 
> scene,  
> a short film from  ARGENTINA INDYMEDIA  & a stripped down version of 'WE
> INTERUPT THIS EMPIRE' - on the barricades in San Fransisco.
>
> The main feature will be the award winning film FOOTPRINTS  -  Filmed 
> in Afghanistan
>  and Laos,  Footprints is a study of the effect of cluster bombs on 
> people and landscape.
> Where once a landscape was life-providing, after contamination by 
> these bombs,
> it becomes a source of terror and death.  The film studies the 
> landscape and
> its people, and enquires into the lives and dreams of the victims of
> cluster-bomb accidents. And finally, it analyses the design and military
> purposes of these weapons, and questions whether they should be 
> subject to
> restrictive laws in the future.
>
> £3 waged, £2 unwaged  ( no one turned away through lack of funds )  
> [please
> print this]