[IMC-bristol] Re: squabbling online

James Venables james at venables.plus.com
Sun Nov 30 00:25:18 PST 2003


 Hello Crash,

 Well, I do disagree with you. I disagree with political correctness, so
 to receive an email expecting it to be arbitrarily enforced is
 unacceptable, laughable, & couldn't be more patronising. I have
 previously complained about threats of violence against others on this
 list, which isn't free speech, & the only unacceptable thing to my
 mind.

 But I don't find the language used on this exchange unacceptable, & you
 have made yourself look entirely silly, painfully PC, & entirely
 childish by taking offence to it in this way. Especially as the nature
 of the complaint was against PC, so to attempt to enforce the very
 issue being contested is a joke, & I therefore choose to entirely
 ignore your request.

 I DO HOWEVER HAVE A COMPLAINT TO MAKE .

 I didn't give my email online, so this email from you is entirely
 unsolicited. You've also forwarded it to Jografer without my
 permission. Don't use it again without my permission, which includes
 you not replying to this email, except to give an immediate apology for
 forwarding my email without my permission. I expect this apology to be
 immediately forthcoming.

 James

 In message <3FC931D1.9060006 at subsection.org.uk>, crash
 <crash at subsection.org.uk> writes
>Re: Mr & Mrs Student Bristol,
>
>James/Jografer, I cannot deny your right to squabble online. But this is
>obviously a long-running dispute you have between yourselves.
>
>We haven't met, therefore I don't hold any grudges against either of you.
>What I would like to suggest, however, is that when you find yourselves
>entering a dispute with someone on the bristol indymedia site, you take
>it offline and work out your differences there?
>That would really make things a lot easier for the BIMC volunteers who
>have to painstakingly look through all comments to see if any of them
>have broken guidelines.
>
>If you feel this is unfair, email me in person, otherwise, I'd be grateful if
>this kind of stuff (e.g. http://bristol.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=1
>0005&group=webcast) is kept off-site unless it's of public interest. Stuff
>like calling people a 'brainless turd' and 'radical poseurs' belongs to the
>'privacy' of chatrooms, not open source newswires, and IMHO only
>diminishes BIMC's standing as an alternative to the Daily Filth.
>
>Cheers + regards,
>
>Crash (BIMC volunteer)
>
>
>--
>This email has been verified as Virus free
>Virus Protection and more available at http://www.plus.net
>

-- 
James Venables



More information about the Imc-bristol mailing list