[IMC-bristol]

[James Venables]

Hello Tom,

The difference is that I'm okay with language used, whereas you claim to 
have a problem with it, but then go on to be make your churlish little 
prick comments about me being idiot. That makes you a sad little 
hypocrite.

So as your little prick brain is set straight Tom, I also put together 
the Bristol-Stop-The-War Newsletter, one of the most informative & 
together bulletins which make it onto this forum.
http://bristol.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=9565&group=webcast


You'll also find some pretty good commentary on these links too:
http://bristol.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=10042&group=webcast
(see comments)
http://bristol.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=10026&group=webcast
(see comments)
http://bristol.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=9971&group=webcast
(see comments)

& what to do you offer this forum Tom? Little prick sniping from the 
sidelines, that's what.

PS: I'm still waiting for that apology Crash.

James

In message <002701c3b79b$902e6780$58ddde89 at ThomasRintoul>, Tom Rintoul 
<paludatus at fastmail.fm> writes
>I've seen the emails to the lists as well as the original post and I dont thin
>that crash's problem is with James's language. Like you said, there's no
>reason to stifle debate by going all PC.
> 
>The point is that indymedia, unlike a discussion in the pub, isnt just a
>forum for a few people to air their views and argue with each other. It has a
> pupose which users should bear in mind while they write. The idea of
>indymedia (as I understand it) is to provide a space in which news can be
>made public from the ground up. It is supposed to be informative. Reading
>James and some other idiot abuse someone doesnt inform anyone of
>anything other than the fact that there are some very childish people
>involved in the indymedia community.

-- 
James Venables