[CIMC-working] egad, and other responses, from mr. g.
Chris Kaihatsu
ckaihatsu at myrealbox.com
Thu, 26 Dec 2002 23:21:54 -0600
Garth, all,
1. I think at most we'd have to take a position in regards to the CPMWG. The
email I forwarded has their listserve/contact info, so you can look into the
underlying issues.
2. Most of the time the global IMC list emails I forward to this list are
for-your-information. I forward them because I figure they may be of
interest to CIMC participants. Again, nothing is "pre-approved" if CIMC
participants generate momentum and consensus against (or for) something.
Doug and I are currently liaisons to/from the CIMC, and we do not want to be
representing positions that have not been consensed upon by the entire
collective.
3. If I am proposing something, I will use the word "proposal" in the
subject line.
4. Which letter are you referring to? As a matter of clarification for
others, you may want to include a link to whatever you're referring to. This
list's archives are at
http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/public/imc-chicago-working/
5. This may sound like I'm stating the obvious, but anything Indymedia is up
to the prerogative of its participants -- you pick your own level/area(s) of
involvement.
Chris
on 12/25/02 7:22 PM, Garth Liebhaber at garthliebhaber@hotmail.com wrote:
>
>
> hey folks,
> read through the emails. here's some responses.
> 1. Chicago Media Working Groups proposal to Channel 11. While we
> aren't in denial about being media activists, I would want more
> discussion/background info on the dynamics. I'm curious about the language
> in the proposal. If we got a letter out of the blue from a group we'd had
> little or no relationship with before telling us they set a meeting up and
> decided the time and place without our input I think we would likely ignore
> them.
> 2. Chris, I know you said that funds for the global south are
> pre-approved, what now with this and LA? Sometimes I am not sure why you
> are forwarding certain things. Could you add a quick memo to the top?
> 3. This includes the article on the usage of subject lines. If
> you are proposing this for us I think we are
> small enough to ask eachother to be clearer in subject lines.
> 4. Doug I like your letter, I think we should send it out and
> start getting answers on these issues.
> 5. sigh, I just spent quite some time going through some of these
> global listserves surrounding the TMF issue and it is quickly leading to
> burnout. I get the feeling that like many other collectives, I want to do
> actual work, putting together features, following news, etc. There seems to
> be a duplicity of listserves that were created at times correlating to a
> certain gumption for a new initiative. Let's just move forward.
>
>
> egad, mr. g.
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.
> http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail&xAPID=42&PS=47575&PI=7324&DI=
> 7474&SU=
> http://www.hotmail.msn.com/cgi-bin/getmsg&HL=1216hotmailtaglines_addphotos_3mf
>
> _______________________________________________
> Imc-chicago-working mailing list
> Imc-chicago-working@lists.indymedia.org
> http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/imc-chicago-working
>