[CIMC-working] (global thread) Fw: Re: [IMC-Process] PROPOSAL: moving IMC-Process to moderation

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 13:50:10 -0500

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

--------=_ModWebBOUNDARY_28f36340_1034880610
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

---

You know, that pit bull behind the fence probably will not attack you unles=
s you start prodding it with a stick. By the way, here's a stick to prod =
the dog with! Brilliant thinking Congress, thanks for looking out for the=
 best interest of the citizens of the United States and the world. 

http://indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=3D208508&group=3Dwebcast

--------=_ModWebBOUNDARY_28f36340_1034880610
Content-Type: message/rfc822;
	name="Re: [IMC-Process] PROPOSAL: moving IMC-Process to moderation.eml"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Disposition: inline

X-Auth-No: 
Return-Path: <imc-process-admin@lists.indymedia.org>
Received: from sarai.indymedia.org not authenticated [207.8.152.244]
	by smtp-send.myrealbox.com with NetMail SMTP Agent $Revision:   3.14  $ on Novell NetWare;
	Wed, 16 Oct 2002 15:39:51 -0600
Received: from sarai.indymedia.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sarai.indymedia.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 4C93D3A2AE4; Wed, 16 Oct 2002 17:39:43 -0400 (EDT)
Delivered-To: imc-process@indymedia.org
Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20])
	by sarai.indymedia.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 370903A2A35
	for <imc-process@indymedia.org>; Wed, 16 Oct 2002 17:37:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (qmail 14640 invoked by uid 0); 16 Oct 2002 21:37:52 -0000
Received: from dsl-213-023-028-245.arcor-ip.net (HELO gmx.net) (213.23.28.245)
  by mail.gmx.net (mp018-rz3) with SMTP; 16 Oct 2002 21:37:52 -0000
Message-ID: <3DADDE02.60405@gmx.net>
From: micmatic <micmatic@gmx.net>
Reply-To: micmatic@gmx.net
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020530
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Sascha Meinrath <sascha@ucimc.org>
Cc: imc-process@indymedia.org
Subject: Re: [IMC-Process] PROPOSAL: moving IMC-Process to moderation
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0210161529400.5372-100000@imsahp>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-DCC-wanadoo-be-Metrics: sarai 1016; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1
X-Pyzor: Reported 0 times.
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.6 required=5.0
	tests=AWL,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IMC,IMC_NAME,INDYMEDIA,REFERENCES,
	      SPAM_PHRASE_02_03,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MOZILLA_UA,
	      X_ACCEPT_LANG
	version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 
Sender: imc-process-admin@lists.indymedia.org
Errors-To: imc-process-admin@lists.indymedia.org
X-BeenThere: imc-process@lists.indymedia.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:imc-process-request@lists.indymedia.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:imc-process@lists.indymedia.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/imc-process>,
	<mailto:imc-process-request@lists.indymedia.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: IMC Process and Decisionmaking Discussion <imc-process.lists.indymedia.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/imc-process>,
	<mailto:imc-process-request@lists.indymedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/public/imc-process/>
X-Original-Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 23:45:38 +0200
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 23:45:38 +0200

Hello.
Would 'moderation' in this case mean that incoming messages were to be 
filtered by the list administrators?
m.

Sascha Meinrath wrote:

>Hi everyone,
>
>I agree with many of the statements being made about the IMC-Process list
>by Sheri, John, Lisa, Changsing, and others.  I think we need facilitation
>of this list in order to move forward in a constructive manner.  Given
>that tensions are running high, that voices are being silenced by the
>current style of debate, and that there are many people who have expressed
>a desire to move beyond the current impass, I would ask that we add a few
>more administrators to our list and move to a moderated proceedure for the
>time-being.
>
>Given that Sheri, Lisa, John, and Chansing have (bravely) expressed a
>desire to improve the current climate on the list.  I propose that, if
>they agree to the responsibility, we make them list administrators and
>that we let them moderate the list until 2003 (at which time we can
>reevaluate).  I know that there are concerns about making these changes,
>and I wouldn't be making this proposal in the first place if I felt the
>issues were not so pressing, but I hope that having a 2003 sunset clause
>on moderation will help alleviate concerns over making these changes.
>
>Many of the issues raised have been talked about (on and off) for a year
>(or more) -- and the same problems have continued to plague this list.
>Hopefully we can all agree that while this is not an ideal solution, it is
>one that will address the ongoing concerns of multiple participants on
>this list.
>
>Because we do not have a decision-making process in place, I propose that
>we follow the one currently being successfully utilized on IMC-Finance
>(see section "2.1 Proposal A"):
>
>http://kropotkin.indymedia.org/moin/moin.cgi/FinanceWorkingGroupSummary
>
>Thus, I am cc-ing translation today, so our timeline will look like:
>
>POSTED: October 16, 2002 by Sascha (Urbana-Champaign IMC)
>DISCUSSION PERIOD: October 19-November 2, 2002
>DECISION DEADLINE: November 2, 2002; Noon GMT
>An additional week-long discussion-extension would extend discussion to: November 9, 2002.
>PASSED: [PENDING]
>
>In solidarity,
>
>--Sascha Meinrath
>Urbana-Champaign IMC
>

_______________________________________________
imc-process mailing list
imc-process@lists.indymedia.org
http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/imc-process

--------=_ModWebBOUNDARY_28f36340_1034880610--