[CIMC-working] sergeant's request

[Chris Kaihatsu]

Chris, your message is a bit unclear to me. It does sound like you're oppos=
ed to responding in any way, but at the same time you express some neutra=
lity in saying there's no upside or downside in responding.

I agree with the message and sentiments expressed in Ian's draft, but perha=
ps the issue is do we trust the sergeant and his role/operations in the f=
irst place to respond, and do we see any advantage to submitting a respon=
se instead of ignoring his request altogether. Certainly we are not oblig=
ated to respond, but can we see fulfilling any interest of our own in doi=
ng so?

If we cannot reasonably expect to secure press privileges, whatever those m=
ay be, as distinguished from any other person writing in a notebook or to=
ting a video camera, then I'd say why bother?

So I guess I'm still kind of open to more discussion.


Chris



-----Original Message-----
From: ChrisGeovanis@aol.com
To: ckaihatsu@myrealbox.com
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 02:39:50 EST
Subject: Re: [CIMC-working] sergeant's request

I'm assuming Chris K's note below refers to the query from the Chicago poli=
ce=20
department re TABD actions. I personally am uncatagorically opposed to=20
responding to this request in any way. This is a stock query from them, and=
 I=20
see no upside -- or downside, for that matter -- in responding to same.

christine

In a message dated 10/28/2002 12:34:17 AM Central Standard Time,=20
ckaihatsu@myrealbox.com writes:


> Subj:[CIMC-working] sergeant's request=20
> Date:10/28/2002 12:34:17 AM Central Standard Time
> From:<A HREF=3D"mailto:ckaihatsu@myrealbox.com">ckaihatsu@myrealbox.com</=
A>
> To:<A HREF=3D"mailto:imc-chicago-working@indymedia.org">imc-chicago-worki=
ng@indymedia.org</A>
> Sent from the Internet=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> In the interest of moving things along and formulating a response to the
> sergeant, are there any further comments on the subject? I'm open to the
> last proposal, if that person (excuse my lack of details) would like to
> draft language, or whatever.
>=20
>=20
> Chris
>=20
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _________________________________________________
> Why the US plans to bomb Iraq and not North Korea
> http://wsws.org/articles/2002/oct2002/kor-o21.shtml
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Imc-chicago-working mailing list
> Imc-chicago-working@lists.indymedia.org
> http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/imc-chicago-working
> 






_________________________________________________
Why the US plans to bomb Iraq and not North Korea
http://wsws.org/articles/2002/oct2002/kor-o21.shtml