[CIMC-work] can we please get consensus on our features?

[Chris Kaihatsu]

Garth, CIMC,

As far as I'm concerned, the features have been fine. I agree that, in terms
of process, it would be better to have CIMC people looking at samples of the
features before they go live -- however, you can consider me to be
"signed-off" on features unless I raise a stink otherwise.


Chris




----- Original Message -----
From: "Garth Liebhaber" <garthliebhaber at care2.com>
To: <imc-chicago-working at lists.indymedia.org>
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 4:19 PM
Subject: [CIMC-work] can we please get consensus on our features?


> our decision making on what becomes a feature seems to have defaulted to
whom has the ability to paste it up.
>
> can pasters at a minimum put the feature up as a proposal, as mitchell has
been doing?  second, if it's put up in an
> emergency, still email the list?  I think we should have a little bit more
group decision making on what becomes a feature
> and not....
>
> gracias,
> garthio
>
> Help the planet each day! It's free and easy:
> http://www.Care2.com/dailyaction/
> _______________________________________________
> Imc-chicago-working mailing list
> Imc-chicago-working at lists.indymedia.org
> http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/imc-chicago-working
>