[CIMC-working] re: Proposal: CIMC block of "Phasm UK" new IMC request

[Chris Kaihatsu]

Doug,

I agree with your assessment. My understanding is that new IMCs are approved
if they are in alignment with the IMC Network's Principles of Unity and if
there are no objections after a week of the IMC Process list being notified.

I put forth a deadline of the end of Tuesday for a CIMC block because that
would fall within the week-long waiting period on the Process list.

Since three CIMCers now support this proposed block, I will submit a CIMC
block of accepting Phasm UK as a new IMC unless there are objections before
the end of Tuesday.


Chris




on 1/6/03 1:02 PM, Doug Morris at being@enteract.com wrote:

> I propose we put back action on this until there is a proposal for approval
> of this imc as an imc.
> 
> I block immediate action.
> 
> I support blocking the formal proposal.
> 
> This proposal from Phasm for a Phasm IMC is a bit ludicrous (if sincere) in
> that it is such a nonfit for the imc network and the proposal is probably
> going to die on its own.
> 
> To take it seriously might make us look silly.
> 
> We are in the midst of what could turn into a huge debate with uc imc. Or
> it might not.
> We need to conserve our credibility.
> 
> Doug
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Imc-chicago-working mailing list
> Imc-chicago-working@lists.indymedia.org
> http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/imc-chicago-working
>