[CIMC-working] re: Proposal: CIMC block of "Phasm UK" new IMC request

[Chris Kaihatsu]

Okay, Doug, thanks for the process clarification. I think you're right -- I
don't want to lose money on this one. (!) I withdraw my proposed block,
given that Phasm is never accepted as a new IMC collective.


Chris




on 1/6/03 7:54 PM, Doug Morris at being@enteract.com wrote:

> Chris,
> 
> Your understanding is correct of a week approval time in terms of a formal
> proposal.
> 
> But, the form submitted by Phasm for Phasm imc is not a formal proposal, it
> is an initial request to start the new imc process.
> 
> It takes a lot of work to go from the initial request to a formal
> proposal.  The Phasm proposal probably will fold before that.
> Want to wager a bet on it?
> 
> Anyway, I maintain my block against sending a note out now.
> 
> Best, Doug
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Imc-chicago-working mailing list
> Imc-chicago-working@lists.indymedia.org
> http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/imc-chicago-working
>