[CIMC-work] Deleting posts from the newswire

[ChrisGeovanis at aol.com]

Hey, ok, this is good policy too. So: people get to delete their own stuff to 
save on bandwidth, and other people's stuff at the other person's request. 
BUT, Ian and other techs: are deletes really deleted, or are they sucking up 
harddrive space somewhere regardless? In which case, delete appears to have 
ulility only in forever making it impossible to query our search engine after a 
particular post that ... has been deleted, ie, 'super hidden' rather than just 
plain old 'hidden'! What's up with that?

christine

In a message dated 3/11/04 11:00:50 AM Central Standard Time, 
garthliebhaber at care2.com writes:


> Subj:Re: Re: [CIMC-work] Deleting posts from the newswire 
> Date:3/11/04 11:00:50 AM Central Standard Time
> From:garthliebhaber at care2.com
> To:imc-chicago-working at lists.indymedia.org
> File:OriginalBody.htm (3687 bytes) DL Time (TCP/IP): < 1 minute
> Sent from the Internet 
> 
> 
> 
> if someone wants to draft a paragraph or two, that's fine 
> with me.  really, there ought to be little to no reason to 
> delete.  I did it on my own stuff not because I had 
> something to hide, but for taking up space with pictures.
> 
> I will continue to delete my practice attempts at 
> PictureBooks, otherways there will be a bunch of garbage 
> there.
> 
> flecko
> 
> Stop baby sea turtles from being crushed!
> http://www.care2.com/go/z/11745/1008
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Imc-chicago-working mailing list
> Imc-chicago-working at lists.indymedia.org
> http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/imc-chicago-working
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.indymedia.org/pipermail/imc-chicago-working/attachments/20040311/2fc17327/attachment.htm