[CIMC-work] process discussion

[ChrisGeovanis at aol.com]

maybe we don't need individual passwords. i'm interested in 1) preserving the 
empowerment and group trust afforded to individual members who take 
responsiblity for editing the wire; 2) making the technicagl aspects of 'hide' as 
simple as possible, and not more timeconsuming. counterproposals?

christine

In a message dated 03/11/2004 6:09:09 PM Central Standard Time, 
garthliebhaber at care2.com writes:


> Subj:Re: Re: [CIMC-work] process discussion    
> Date:03/11/2004 6:09:09 PM Central Standard Time
> From:garthliebhaber at care2.com
> To:imc-chicago-working at lists.indymedia.org
> File:OriginalBody.htm (9771 bytes) DL Time (TCP/IP): < 1 minute
> Sent from the Internet 
> 
> 
> 
> I can start typing in notes on why i hid something.  
> indeed, i did today.  i guess if we each put our initials on 
> it as well, like chris k has been doing, that's fine too.
> 
> one reason i kinda didn't was because often it's obvious 
> and second, i THINK, if i remember correctly, that hidden 
> articles can be unhidden if someone gives it a high 
> enough rating.
> 
> do we need individual passwords?  i don't really see the 
> need.  if anything, perhaps we should update it just for 
> the sake of doing so.  unless it means old stuff needs the 
> old password?
> 
> largely, this issue (i think) has been my fault.  i promise to 
> be better.  what's not my fault ought to be discussed, it 
> might mean a lurker w/ password? but my senses don't 
> indicate this.
> 
> g.
> 
> Stop baby sea turtles from being crushed!
> http://www.care2.com/go/z/11745/1008
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Imc-chicago-working mailing list
> Imc-chicago-working at lists.indymedia.org
> http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/imc-chicago-working
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.indymedia.org/pipermail/imc-chicago-working/attachments/20040313/0647e48f/attachment.html