(admin passwords?) Re: [CIMC-work] process discussion

[Chris Kaihatsu]

CIMC,

The group-trust approach is fine by me (as opposed to individual passwords), but I still hold the position that any changes should be accompanied by the editor's initials, for any required future reference.


Chris




On Sat, 13 Mar 2004 18:21:52 EST, ChrisGeovanis at aol.com wrote:
> maybe we don't need individual passwords. i'm interested in 1) 
> preserving the empowerment and group trust afforded to individual 
> members who take responsiblity for editing the wire; 2) making the 
> technicagl aspects of 'hide' as simple as possible, and not more 
> timeconsuming. counterproposals?
> 
> christine
> 
> In a message dated 03/11/2004 6:09:09 PM Central Standard Time, 
> garthliebhaber at care2.com writes:
> 
> 
> Subj:Re: Re: [CIMC-work] process discussion   
> Date:03/11/2004 6:09:09 PM Central Standard Time
> From:garthliebhaber at care2.com
> To:imc-chicago-working at lists.indymedia.org
> File:OriginalBody.htm (9771 bytes) DL Time (TCP/IP): < 1 minute
> Sent from the Internet
> 
> 
> 
> I can start typing in notes on why i hid something. 
> indeed, i did today.  i guess if we each put our initials on
> it as well, like chris k has been doing, that's fine too.
> 
> one reason i kinda didn't was because often it's obvious
> and second, i THINK, if i remember correctly, that hidden
> articles can be unhidden if someone gives it a high
> enough rating.
> 
> do we need individual passwords?  i don't really see the
> need.  if anything, perhaps we should update it just for
> the sake of doing so.  unless it means old stuff needs the
> old password?
> 
> largely, this issue (i think) has been my fault.  i promise to
> be better.  what's not my fault ought to be discussed, it
> might mean a lurker w/ password? but my senses don't
> indicate this.
> 
> g.
> 
> Stop baby sea turtles from being crushed!
> http://www.care2.com/go/z/11745/1008
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Imc-chicago-working mailing list
> Imc-chicago-working at lists.indymedia.org
> http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/imc-chicago-working
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Imc-chicago-working mailing list
> Imc-chicago-working at lists.indymedia.org
> http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/imc-chicago-working






__________________________________________________________ 
The 2004 US election: the case for a socialist alternative
A public conference sponsored by the World Socialist Web Site and the Socialist Equality Party
wsws.org/articles/2004/feb2004/call-f17.shtml