IMC-US-Process list... Re: Re: [CIMC-work] (issue of local IMC representation at the globallevel) Fwd: ...

[Ian Bicking]

On Mar 14, 2004, at 12:07 PM, Chris Kaihatsu wrote:
> I'll agree that Sascha's posting of "list rules" for the 
> IMC-US-Process list is suspect, since, as far as I could see, it was 
> done summarily by him, with no larger consensus process involved. Of 
> course this begs the larger, ever-present situation that the IMC 
> Network (and CIMC, for that matter) has no set policy for 
> decision-making. (Garth, please dig up your own links.)
>
> Oh, shit -- I'm noticing that the IMC-US-Process list is not even 
> listed from the lists.indymedia.org page. I'll assume, based on this 
> fact, that the list does not have publicly accessible archives. If 
> others here consense that this is problematic I'd be glad to bring it 
> up on the IMC-US-Process list.

The list and archives are public, just not listed.  You might want to 
bring that up -- I expect it is an oversight, and I believe the list 
admin can resolve it (or it can go to the listwork mailing list -- the 
index page is periodically regenerated, but that process may be 
broken).

--
Ian Bicking | ianb at colorstudy.com | http://blog.ianbicking.org