Re: (admin passwords?) Re: [CIMC-work] process discussion

[ChrisGeovanis at aol.com]

After M20, let's have a tech training in front of our boxes and get the 
non-tech types up to speed on what we CAN do, what we SHOULD do re editing, how to 
make the process less tedious, including via tech tweaks if necessary. That 
might clear up a lot of this confusion.

yikes.

christine

In a message dated 3/14/04 1:15:45 PM Central Standard Time, 
garthliebhaber at care2.com writes:

> Subj: Re: Re: (admin passwords?)  Re: [CIMC-work] process discussion 
>  Date: 3/14/04 1:15:45 PM Central Standard Time
>  From: garthliebhaber at care2.com
>  To: imc-chicago-working at lists.indymedia.org
>  Sent from the Internet 
> 
> 
> 
> if you're referring to the John Morgan post on killing pets 
> in Grant Park, I thought I said I hid it.  Now, I noticed this 
> morning that the article was deleted.  this makes me 
> wonder,
> as the other day while looking at a comment (forget what) 
> i totally hit one of the buttons on the parent article sub-
> section.  the page reloaded but i couldn't find which 
> article I may have affected.  those buttons are just edit 
> and article options, so i don't know. and i wasn't drunk!
> 
> so i don't know, maybe i'm to blame specifically.  and like 
> i admitted, i'd started deleting some of criollo's string of 
> posts as it was a step easier than hiding, and as i was 
> really tired.
> 
> now, that hasn't happened in a while, since the galactic 
> troll attack ended, so if there's other stuff recently, it 
> wasn't me.
> 
> Upshot, if you think we should use individual admins, 
> then go for it. if it clears this up, and you don't mind 
> doing the tech work, go for it.  
> 
> g.
>             
>             On Mar 14, 2004, at 11:58 AM, Chris 
> Kaihatsu wrote:
> >The group-trust approach is fine by me (as opposed to 
> individual 
> >passwords), but I still hold the position that any 
> changes should be 
> >accompanied by the editor's initials, for any required 
> future 
> >reference.
> 
> Since whoever deleted those articles hasn't spoken up, I 
> believe we 
> need to go to individual accounts.  Very possibly the 
> person is simply 
> using the site incorrectly and needs instruction, or they 
> aren't 
> keeping up on the mailing list and didn't see the my post 
> about this 
> (so they didn't respond), or something, but we need to 
> know who it was, 
> especially since it's part of a larger pattern of deleted 
> posts.
> 
> I'm perfectly okay with people using aliases, so long as 
> people in the 
> collective are aware of how people match up with the 
> aliases.  
> Hopefully that can handle privacy concerns.
> 
>   Ian
> 
> 
> 
> Stop baby sea turtles from being crushed!
> http://www.care2.com/go/z/11745/1008
> _______________________________________________
> Imc-chicago-working mailing list
> Imc-chicago-working at lists.indymedia.org
> http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/imc-chicago-working
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.indymedia.org/pipermail/imc-chicago-working/attachments/20040315/bde95f07/attachment.htm