(admin passwords?) Re: [CIMC-work] process discussion

[ChrisGeovanis at aol.com]

I don't want to type in my initials. I don't want to have to do a damned 
thing that takes more time unless it's absolutely necessary. I also don't want my 
initials out there. I just don't. I got enough problems with the cop fuckers 
that are scanning this list as we speak. Individual passwords build in 
rock-solid accountability where necessary, and I'm for accountability AND privacy 
protection. 

christine

In a message dated 3/14/04 11:59:32 AM Central Standard Time, 
ckaihatsu at myrealbox.com writes:

> Subj: (admin passwords?) Re: [CIMC-work] process discussion 
>  Date: 3/14/04 11:59:32 AM Central Standard Time
>  From: ckaihatsu at myrealbox.com
>  To: imc-chicago-working at indymedia.org
>  Sent from the Internet 
> 
> 
> 
> CIMC,
> 
> The group-trust approach is fine by me (as opposed to individual passwords), 
> but I still hold the position that any changes should be accompanied by the 
> editor's initials, for any required future reference.
> 
> 
> Chris
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Sat, 13 Mar 2004 18:21:52 EST, ChrisGeovanis at aol.com wrote:
> >maybe we don't need individual passwords. i'm interested in 1) 
> >preserving the empowerment and group trust afforded to individual 
> >members who take responsiblity for editing the wire; 2) making the 
> >technicagl aspects of 'hide' as simple as possible, and not more 
> >timeconsuming. counterproposals?
> >
> >christine
> >
> >In a message dated 03/11/2004 6:09:09 PM Central Standard Time, 
> >garthliebhaber at care2.com writes:
> >
> >
> >Subj:Re: Re: [CIMC-work] process discussion   
> >Date:03/11/2004 6:09:09 PM Central Standard Time
> >From:garthliebhaber at care2.com
> >To:imc-chicago-working at lists.indymedia.org
> >File:OriginalBody.htm (9771 bytes) DL Time (TCP/IP): <1 minute
> >Sent from the Internet
> >
> >
> >
> >I can start typing in notes on why i hid something. 
> >indeed, i did today.  i guess if we each put our initials on
> >it as well, like chris k has been doing, that's fine too.
> >
> >one reason i kinda didn't was because often it's obvious
> >and second, i THINK, if i remember correctly, that hidden
> >articles can be unhidden if someone gives it a high
> >enough rating.
> >
> >do we need individual passwords?  i don't really see the
> >need.  if anything, perhaps we should update it just for
> >the sake of doing so.  unless it means old stuff needs the
> >old password?
> >
> >largely, this issue (i think) has been my fault.  i promise to
> >be better.  what's not my fault ought to be discussed, it
> >might mean a lurker w/ password? but my senses don't
> >indicate this.
> >
> >g.
> >
> >Stop baby sea turtles from being crushed!
> >http://www.care2.com/go/z/11745/1008
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Imc-chicago-working mailing list
> >Imc-chicago-working at lists.indymedia.org
> >http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/imc-chicago-working
> >
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Imc-chicago-working mailing list
> >Imc-chicago-working at lists.indymedia.org
> >http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/imc-chicago-working
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________________ 
> The 2004 US election: the case for a socialist alternative
> A public conference sponsored by the World Socialist Web Site and the 
> Socialist Equality Party
> wsws.org/articles/2004/feb2004/call-f17.shtml
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Imc-chicago-working mailing list
> Imc-chicago-working at lists.indymedia.org
> http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/imc-chicago-working
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.indymedia.org/pipermail/imc-chicago-working/attachments/20040315/c01e9563/attachment.htm