[Imc-dc-editorial] Ellsberg Feature

[Rev Brian]

On the note of language, I'd say it's important to
note in any feature the exchange I overheard between a
staffer and a cameraperson for a major network that's
in bed with a major software company.

To wit:

"Ellsberg's biggest assumption [in suggesting
potential leaks be brought to the press] is that the
press is the same now as when he leaked the Pentagon
Papers."


--- matthew bradley <matt@machination.org> wrote:
> on the semantics thing, joanie could write a
> credible paper on how 
> imporant the papers were.
> 
> i have agreed with chuck, not on the importance of
> the papers, but 
> rather that chuck assessment of the importance of
> the papers is in 
> check with ELLSBERG's assessment with the importance
> of the paper's 
> (and chomsky's). i cite my conversations of this
> afternoon.
> 
> i consider ellsberg, and chomsky, to be two of the
> most authoritative 
> analysts and credible opinions on the topic.
> 
> not that there aren't others.
> 
> m
> 
> On Tuesday, Mar 11, 2003, at 22:03 US/Eastern, old
> school wrote:
> 
> > Agree to feature on what he said today.
> > Damn! I wonder what this means "worst-case"?!!
> >
> >
> > --- Rev Brian <rev_bri@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > "worst-case scenario planning in the Nixon WH."
> >>
> >> I think these points merit a new feature on his
> talk
> >> today.
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Yahoo! Web Hosting - establish your business
> online
> > http://webhosting.yahoo.com
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Imc-dc-editorial mailing list
> > Imc-dc-editorial@lists.indymedia.org
> >
>
http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/imc-dc-editorial
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Imc-dc-editorial mailing list
> Imc-dc-editorial@lists.indymedia.org
>
http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/imc-dc-editorial