[IMC-Editorial] A Leap Toward Socialized Medicine -- By One Vote
Sean Saulsbury
sean at boxofficemojo.com
Wed Jul 2 22:59:10 PDT 2003
July 2, 2003
Contact: Scott Holleran
Tel: (818) 842-2060
E-Mail: scott at afcm.org
A Leap Toward Socialized Medicine -- By One Vote
by Scott Holleran
Last week, Congress approved President Bush's expansion of Medicare by one
vote. Once Bush signs the bill, every American over age 65 will lose the
freedom to choose, pay for and control drug treatments. The proposal, set to
start in three years, is a plan only Hillary Clinton could love.
In fact, its core premise -- medical treatment controlled by the state - is
an exact application of the Clinton health care philosophy. The similarity
is not lost on the Clinton administration's former Medicare administrator,
Nancy-Ann DeParle, who told the Washington Post: "Democrats should do
everything they can to whisk [the Medicare bill] to [Bush's] desk. In
signing it, as he will surely be forced to do, he will preside over the
biggest expansion of government health benefits since the Great Society."
Even the conservative Heritage Foundation, which rarely opposes any Bush
administration notion, opposed the Medicare reform. Heritage called it "an
unforgivable failure of leadership." The conservative newspaper Human
Events, labeled the GOP-backed bills "fiscally and morally indefensible."
Conservatives denounced Bush and the GOP too late. Both House and Senate
versions of the bill control the cost and distribution of drugs for older
Americans -- three quarters of whom already have private drug coverage --
and grant government the power to define what drugs are acceptable for
seniors and how much they will cost.
Seniors with their own private coverage are likely to lose it. The
government's Congressional Budget Office estimates that 37 percent of all
the nation's employers will eliminate their retired employees' drug
benefits. The real percentage is probably much higher.
Rationing health care for older Americans is, in a certain sense, Medicare's
destiny; it had to happen. In 1965, on the premise that health care is a
right, government forced doctors and hospitals to treat everyone over age 65
by rates and standards determined by the state --- while preserving a
patients' right to choose his or her doctor. Predictably, with health care
for seniors subsidized, patients and doctors used medicine more than
necessary, driving costs up. Over the years, socialized medicine for seniors
has completely distorted the market in medicine.
Bush and the GOP-controlled Congress have abandoned the free market
approach -- protecting free choice by gradually eliminating subsidized
health care for seniors -- because it has been deemed politically
impossible. Instead, Bush's Medicare bill lets bureaucrats control how,
when, where - and whether -- older Americans receive treatment.
The Medicare bill puts to rest the notion that Bush and today's Republicans
are seriously opposed to government-run health care. As one Republican --
quoted in an Associated Press story -- put it: "We just caved." Bush's
handpicked Senate Majority Leader, Bill Frist, recently proclaimed: "What we
do ... will affect every American." Frist is right: what he's done will make
practicing and receiving medicine much worse.
President Bush, who has broken promises on everything from expanding medical
savings accounts (MSAs) to opposing campaign finance reform, is advancing
government-controlled health care faster than Hillary Clinton. As the New
York Times described Bush's encouragement of the Medicare bill, "[Bush] has
signaled, repeatedly, [his] willingness to compromise on ... free market
principles."
The President's latest compromise makes Bush the nation's foremost advocate
of state-run health care -- which, for every American, means less choice,
higher costs and one huge step toward socialized medicine.
------------------
Scott Holleran (scott at afcm.org) is a health care correspondent and
commentator. Holleran was a campaign aide and congressional assistant to
House Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education Appropriations
Subcommittee Chairman Rep. John Porter, (R, IL,). Holleran's articles have
been published in the Wall Street Journal, Silicon Valley Business Journal,
Philadelphia Inquirer and the Los Angeles Times.
------------------
Americans for Free Choice In Medicine (AFCM)
http://www.afcm.org
1525 Superior Avenue, Suite 101
Newport Beach, CA 92663
E-Mail: press at afcm.org
(c) Copyright 2003 Americans for Free Choice In Medicine
All rights reserved.
This message sent to: imc-editorial at lists.indymedia.org
More information about the imc-editorial
mailing list