[Imc-finance] SF-IMC response to Proposal B

[Elizabeth Hansen]

Hello all,

the StL IMC had a meeting on 6-4 and we had a few questions about how the
translation process works.  Is there a timeline for when translations must
be completed?  

in to which languages do the proposals get translated?

Do all finance proposals automatically get sent to the translation lists?

Is the author responsible for getting the proposal translated before it
becomes an official proposal?

We think it is a good idea to set the timeline based on when the
translations are completed, to make the process fair for all language
speakers.  

Liz Hansen
StL IMC volunteer and liaison


> From: Lisa <imc_dc@yahoo.com>
> Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2002 15:47:05 -0700 (PDT)
> To: imc-finance@lists.indymedia.org
> Subject: [Imc-finance] SF-IMC response to Proposal B
> 
> the SF-IMC consensed on the below response to
> "Proposal B" - however, we still need time to discuss
> "Proposal A." 
> 
> lisa
> sf-imc liaison group member
> 
> *****
> San Francisco IMC endorses the 2 day decision-making
> timeline for emergency funding.
> 
> San Francisco IMC endorses St. Louis IMC's proposal to
> change the discussion period for expenditures below
> $500 from 4 days to 1 week, with an added clause, 1
> week *After translation*.
> 
> In addition San Francisco IMC proposes to change the
> discussion period for expenditures above $500 from 1
> week to 1 month *After translation*. The one month
> time period is to allow time for discussion by local
> IMCs, which may only meet once per month.
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
> http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Imc-finance mailing list
> Imc-finance@lists.indymedia.org
> http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/imc-finance