[Imc-finance] IMC-Atlanta Amendment to Proposal A
Elizabeth Hansen
eehansen at artsci.wustl.edu
Thu Jun 6 17:58:15 2002
> This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
--MS_Mac_OE_3106227360_868617_MIME_Part
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
The St. Louis IMC does NOT want to extend the discussion period to 30 days.
We think just one week is long enough.
Liz Hansen
StL IMC volunteer and liaison
From: Warren Goodwin <warren@riseup.net>
Date: Sat, 01 Jun 2002 22:23:50 -0400
To: imc-finance@lists.indymedia.org, Imc-atlanta@indymedia.org
Subject: [Imc-finance] IMC-Atlanta Amendment to Proposal A
Regarding Proposal A, the Atlanta IMC was not comfortable with the speed
with which the meta-proposal segments passed, and does not want to use an
unmodified version of that process for future structural changes to
IMC-Finance. It is our belief that the 1-week discussion period allotted
is too short for any sort of consensus process to happen on the local level.
We would like to add an Amendment to Proposal A that the initial discussion
period be lengthened to 30 days (rather than 1 week.) With this amendment,
we will support proposal A.
The key section of Proposal A, as amended would read:
1. Week long discussion period; -Amended to "30-day Discussion Period"
2. Week-long discussion extensions by request;
3. Clearly defined decision deadlines;
4. Posting pending working group decisions/deadlines to our summary page.
-Sincerely,
Warren Goodwin,
for IMC-Atlanta
--MS_Mac_OE_3106227360_868617_MIME_Part
Content-type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>Re: [Imc-finance] IMC-Atlanta Amendment to Proposal A</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
The St. Louis IMC does NOT want to extend the discussion period to 30 days.=
We think just one week is long enough. <BR>
<BR>
Liz Hansen<BR>
StL IMC volunteer and liaison<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE><BR>
<B>From: </B>Warren Goodwin <warren@riseup.net><BR>
<B>Date: </B>Sat, 01 Jun 2002 22:23:50 -0400<BR>
<B>To: </B>imc-finance@lists.indymedia.org, Imc-atlanta@indymedia.org<BR>
<B>Subject: </B>[Imc-finance] IMC-Atlanta Amendment to Proposal A<BR>
<BR>
</BLOCKQUOTE><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE><BR>
Regarding Proposal A, the Atlanta IMC was not comfortable with the speed wi=
th which the meta-proposal segments passed, and does not want to use an unmo=
dified version of that process for future structural changes to IMC-Finance.=
It is our belief that the 1-week discussion period allotted is =
too short for any sort of consensus process to happen on the local level. &n=
bsp;We would like to add an Amendment to Proposal A that the initial discuss=
ion period be lengthened to 30 days (rather than 1 week.) With this am=
endment, we will support proposal A.<BR>
<BR>
The key section of Proposal A, as amended would read:<BR>
<BR>
1. Week long discussion period; <B>-Amended to "30-day Discussion Peri=
od"<BR>
</B>2. Week-long discussion extensions by request;<BR>
3. Clearly defined decision deadlines;<BR>
4. Posting pending working group decisions/deadlines to our summary page.<B=
R>
<BR>
-Sincerely,<BR>
Warren Goodwin,<BR>
for IMC-Atlanta<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
</BLOCKQUOTE><BR>
</BODY>
</HTML>
--MS_Mac_OE_3106227360_868617_MIME_Part--