RES: [Translation] Re: [Imc-finance] SF-IMC response to Proposal B

[dri]

hi,
something useful i´ve been doing in the last coupple was trying to get
relevant information  translated. Sometimes i´ve done it myself, many many
times i just asked translation team by sending an e-mail request.
There was no need to set up timeline, usually the active pt and es lists do
it pretty soon.
There has been coordination between spanish and portuguese translations, and
recently we started to share some information with IMC Portugal. IMC Uruguay
uses twiki frequently as a tool for many volunteers to share the work and
there is a good collaborative enviroment betwen us. Surely this  could not
be done without the effort of a lot of individuals ;)
As for the proposals from imc-finance, our local liason is doing summarys in
portuguese, and CC Imc Brasil list.
Finnaly, i can say there is a lot of energy to keep local groups informed,
even though i can´t (and is definitely not my intention) speak for others
then IMC-BH.
Thanks for Liz and IMC St. Louis to raise such an important subject for the
network ;)
solidarity,
dri

-----Mensagem original-----
De: translation-admin@lists.indymedia.org
[mailto:translation-admin@lists.indymedia.org]Em nome de Elizabeth
Hansen
Enviada em: quinta-feira, 6 de junho de 2002 18:54
Para: imc-finance@lists.indymedia.org; imc stl; translation; final
translation
Assunto: [Translation] Re: [Imc-finance] SF-IMC response to Proposal B


Hello all,

the StL IMC had a meeting on 6-4 and we had a few questions about how the
translation process works.  Is there a timeline for when translations must
be completed?

in to which languages do the proposals get translated?

Do all finance proposals automatically get sent to the translation lists?

Is the author responsible for getting the proposal translated before it
becomes an official proposal?

We think it is a good idea to set the timeline based on when the
translations are completed, to make the process fair for all language
speakers.

Liz Hansen
StL IMC volunteer and liaison


> From: Lisa <imc_dc@yahoo.com>
> Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2002 15:47:05 -0700 (PDT)
> To: imc-finance@lists.indymedia.org
> Subject: [Imc-finance] SF-IMC response to Proposal B
>
> the SF-IMC consensed on the below response to
> "Proposal B" - however, we still need time to discuss
> "Proposal A."
>
> lisa
> sf-imc liaison group member
>
> *****
> San Francisco IMC endorses the 2 day decision-making
> timeline for emergency funding.
>
> San Francisco IMC endorses St. Louis IMC's proposal to
> change the discussion period for expenditures below
> $500 from 4 days to 1 week, with an added clause, 1
> week *After translation*.
>
> In addition San Francisco IMC proposes to change the
> discussion period for expenditures above $500 from 1
> week to 1 month *After translation*. The one month
> time period is to allow time for discussion by local
> IMCs, which may only meet once per month.
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
> http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Imc-finance mailing list
> Imc-finance@lists.indymedia.org
> http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/imc-finance

_______________________________________________
translation mailing list
translation@lists.indymedia.org
http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/translation

---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.362 / Virus Database: 199 - Release Date: 07/05/02

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.362 / Virus Database: 199 - Release Date: 07/05/02