[Imc-finance] Ford Foundation and confidence-unity issues

[frank]

> Given this liaison structure, our inclusive,
> participatory structure, and our own integrity as an organization, I do
> not think it would be either advisable or necessary to have "Everything
> UCIMC is involved in...on this list and subject to global discussion."
> If this were required, the UCIMC would probably not sponsor the global
> Network, and I doubt very much that we would find _any_ non-profit that
> would agree to this demand.  I do not mean this to sound harsh, but if one
> looks through this e-mail list's archives, one will find that the UCIMC
> has been incredibly open and communicative with this list.

I'm confused about this.  Everything that UCIMC is involved in certainly
would not need to be discussed by everyone in the Global IMC network.

But when UCIMC or any other IMC is doing something that effects the entire
network, it seems it definately should be discussed openly with everyone
involved before a descision is made.

Did I misunderstand something you were referring to perhaps?

frank