[Imc-france-paris] Suisse : Rejet de la depenalisation du cannabis

[FARId]

Bonjour, 
Pour ceux et celles qui veulent en savoir plus sur la decision du Parlement suisse de ne pas depenaliser l'usage de cannabis, voici une breve en anglais qui vous permettra de faire le point. 

Pour ceux et celles qui ne lisent pas l'anglais, cet article detaille les raisons qui ont conduit le Parlement suisse a rejeter la proposition de modification de la loi sur la production et la consommation de cannabis. 
Depuis decembre 2001, c'est la quatrieme tentative et donc echec de cette proposition. La raison de ce rejet est la peur des parlementaires de voir naitre des disparites politiques sur le territoire, et l'argument habituel utilise pour "lutter contre la drogue" qui est, qu'il faut proteger les enfants et pour cela le cannabis doit reste illegal.

Chose amusante, les organisations de fonctionnaires de police et de l'education nationale, comme l'office federal de la Sante condamne "le manque de courage des politiques"... meme le Ministre de l'Interieur Monsieur COUCHEPIN de centre-droit y est alle de son couplet arguant que 500000 personnes enfreignent la loi, et qu'il faudrait la mettre en coherence avec la realite, en declarant devant les Parlementaires suisses "One cannot act as if they do not exist in the name of an unattainable ideal of abstinence," - "Nous ne pouvons agir sans prendre en consideration leur existence au nom d'un ideal d'abstinence impossible a atteindre" 

Bonne lecture, 
FARId

Swissinfo
June 15, 2004

Parliament rejects decriminalisation of cannabis 

Smoking a joint will remain illegal in Switzerland after parliament threw out government proposals to decriminalise cannabis. 

The House of Representatives refused by 102 votes to 92 to debate amendments to the drug law - the second time it has dismissed the proposal. 

It was the fourth attempt since December 2001 to vote on a government proposal aimed at decriminalising the production and consumption of cannabis for personal use. 

The other parliamentary chamber, the Senate, has twice come out in favour of a more liberal drugs policy. 

But in last autumn's session, which came just ahead of parliamentary elections, the House of Representatives dismissed the proposal outright. 

Monday's debate was touted as the last chance for the bill and its rejection means that current drugs legislation - which is 30 years old - will remain in force. 

Blow 

The decision comes as a blow to supporters of a more liberal drugs policy, including the interior minister, Pascal Couchepin, the centre- left Social Democrats and the Green Party. 

Thomas Zeltner, director of the Federal Health Office, said he regretted the decision. 

"[The rejection of the bill] leads to fears that certain cantons will be tempted to make their own laws, which will create inequality in the country," said Zeltner. 

"We can continue to live with the law, but it does pose problems," he added. 

The Social Democrats said in a statement that they were disappointed by the decision, especially as it came on the same day that parliament agreed to lift a century-old ban on absinthe. 

The party said that it condemned the "denial of reality which raises doubts about whether we have a pragmatic and efficient public health policy". Updating the law 

Couchepin had argued that it was time to take into account the current situation in Switzerland - some 500,000 people are estimated to smoke dope regularly. 

"One cannot act as if they do not exist in the name of an unattainable ideal of abstinence," Couchepin said during the debate. 

Under the government proposal, the consumption of cannabis and possession of it for personal use would no longer have been a criminal offence. 

Limited trade in the drug would also have been allowed, but the import and export of cannabis would have remained outlawed. 

Police officials and teachers said they were disappointed that parliamentarians had thrown out the proposal. 

Michel Graf from the Institute for the Prevention of Alcohol and Drug Addiction criticised the "lack of courage by politicians" and the "missed opportunity for a real debate". 

In the end, the rightwing Swiss People's Party and a number of parliamentarians from the Centre-right tipped the balance against revision of the law. 

Here to stay 

Ruth Humbel Näf from the Committee for Social Security and Health - which was in favour of keeping the status quo - said that young people could only be protected if cannabis remained illegal. 

She argued that Switzerland would have become a centre for the trade in drugs had parliamentarians supported the bill. 

But the issue is not destined to disappear following Monday's decision. 

The Christian Democrats said they planned to launch a parliamentary initiative to revise the law according to the four pillars of Switzerland's drugs policy: prevention, therapy, repression and harm reduction. 

The proposal also advocates punishing cannabis consumption by imposing small fines. 

The Committee for the Protection of Young People Against the Criminalisation of Drugs is also planning to launch a people's initiative for a "reasonable cannabis policy and efficient protection of young people". 

The committee is made up of young Social Democrats and Greens and also includes some supporters of the Christian Democrats and Radicals. 

swissinfo with agencies 

Copyright © Swissinfo / Neue Zürcher Zeitung AG 
-------------- section suivante --------------
Une pièce jointe HTML a été enlevée...
URL: http://lists.indymedia.org/pipermail/imc-france-paris/attachments/20040616/2fce77d0/attachment-0001.htm