[Imc-lwg-general] constitution refinement proposal

[Richard Malter]

I thought a little more about the const. - after meeting with the 'london-based 
collective' [this name in lieu of . . ] - and more generally after presentation 
to attac that we (Toni/I) gave.

Propose: change use of term 'subgroup' to 'component group' (that we touched 
on).

Why? 
-its purely functional, which is what we wanted.
-it has no ordered spatial setting-out of parts (that can in any way be grasped 
as belonging to hierarchy paradigm). 
-it helps functional/holarchical conception more, and more consistent with it.
-its actually more accurate

Devil's advocate: 
- it sounds dry
- it _sounds_ a bit 'mechanical', and so not so human.

lets think about it?

Richard