[Imc-lwg-work] Re: [Imc-uk-process] UkWebpageContactNew improved

[Richard Malter]

> Richard Malter wrote on 28/9/02 4:05 pm:
> >I worked on 
> >http://docs.indymedia.org/twiki/bin/view/Local/UkWebpageContactNew
> >
> >Andi or Toni, please upload and replace on 
> >http://uk.indymedia.org/contact.php3
> >
> >Thanks,
> >
> >Richard
> 
> Quoting andi <andi@syndicate.org.uk>:
> hi richard,
> 
> i just checked out your changes and agree with many of them. but i
> don't agree with you listing yourselves as the only "Local Indymedia
> group". 

Hey Andi. I followed your catogorization of local groups as those who don't 
have a website uniquely; but, yes, include whoever you wish in "Local Indymedia 
groups" - including your group. 

>i will work on it in the next few days. i think we're very
> near consensus but until that has been declared please don't upload
> your changes into the live page yet.

OK. Agreed. Post a note when you have worked on it please.
> 
> i saw that you as well edited the editorial guidelines - there are
> several issues there, especially your inclusion of "2 methods for
> features". i find it rather bad style that you didn't notify
> features or process of your changes...

Yes, I forgot to, I apologize.
I was though disgusted that after months of difficult talking people in your 
group (?) were still effectively disinformationing using the name "imc-uk-
collective" for a group that doesn't exist, and effectively ignoring all 
previous discussion. That is not respectful in the least.

> 
> anyhow, if twiki as a tool should ever be useful we should agree on
> a process *when* proposed changes on a twiki can be uploaded onto
> the live page. maybe we need a proposal to the process list and if
> there were no objections after a month it means the changes are
> consensus-ed?
>

It's already very usefull :)) throughout Indymedia.
A month is too long I think, also depends on the document. For something like 
contact update - a week maximum is what i might imagine.

Richard