[Imc-lwg-work] Re: [Imc-uk-features] new version of 9.2 Editorial Guidelines

[Richard Malter]

Quoting balk@mac.com:
> I am sorry folks it has taken me so long but in consideration of legal 
> and other meetings as decided at the IMC meeting -

This is confusing - which meeting are you referring to? Of whom? And are you 
going to publish minutes? 

 I have finally posted 
> up the
> new editorial guidelines to take into account the use of features and 
> the double purpose of add comments as well as many other things.
>[] 
> love 1 of IMC UK
> 
> 

The naming of an "IMC UK Collective" in the title and throughout,
"New Editorial Guidelines of the IMC UK Collective vs 9.2"  
belongs to a time when a group of people (that including me) in London called 
themselves that in the very early days. Since then things have grown and 
developed and we have had very large amounts of discussion about new names 
needed for the now many groups in Indymedia UK and even within London - London 
working group and [as yet unnamed] London group. It's all in the archives for 
anyone who cares to read through it. So this needs incorporating throughout.
http://docs.indymedia.org/twiki/bin/view/Local/UkWebpageEdGuidelinesNew

Re the rest of the document, we'll go through it on the Twiki. 

Thanks,

Richard
Lwg/Imc UK

imc-london-wg-work@lists.indymedia.org

imc-london-wg-work@lists.indymedia.org