[Imc-summaries] administration of the list

[Bernard D. Tremblay (Ben)]

Joeri wrote:

> >>anna wrote:
> >>there were some reactions to my question concerning administration of
> >>the list. most of them suggested to keep it moderated to avoid
> >>discussions on the list. in the past this has been discussed and people
> >>found the consensus to rather discuss on other lists and keep this one
> >>for summaries. there are more than 500 people subscribed.
> >>
> >>it makes sense to me.
> >>
> ben wrote:
> >Wouldn't it make sense, since it's not for discussion, that there be only a
> >small number of people who can /send/ to the list? i.e. those who generate
> >the summaries. One or two people (whoever is on the team) would have access
> >to send, and nobody else.
> >
> hey Ben,
>
> i don't agree with that, as i think rotation of making summaries has to
> be supported (more people making summaries means more people to send
> them to this list)

Controlling access means not rotating?
Rotating means having no control?
I don't see how that's entailed.

I bet there could be far fewer than 500 subscribed and there could still be
rotation of tasks.

> greets
> joeri

hfx_ben