[New-imc] Re: [Imc-finance] leaving the working group

Amber Black ablack2 at pipeline.com
Mon Aug 26 22:45:04 PDT 2002


At 02:13 PM 8/26/2002 -0700, you wrote:
>Hey I didn't mean to create a big issue. I'm sorry that i don't have time
>to help. Removing westernmass from the cities list is not saying that you
>aren't forming an imc or that you need to rego through the new imc
>process. Just that your website is still under construction. It is also of
>course your decision.
>
>The first few times it's come up on the new-imc list i was generally
>supportive of giving the westernmass imc more time.


I am curious why this concern was dealt with on the new imc list and not 
addressed directly to the wmass imc, via our contact info, our lists, 
etc.  Or was it, and I am misunderstanding?


>This whole thing seems like a really minor issue and not worth getting
>upset about either way. Let's focus our energy on our media activism and
>not arguing either way.

I think that this discussion has sparked these responses because of 
frustration among folks here in wmass about these very questions:  are we 
or are we not moving fwd?  will we or will we not have a regular imc 
website?  is there or is there not someone(s) actively working on the 
website?  is there anyone interested in taking initiative on this website 
issue, on organizing meetings, on replying to discussion items, etc.

Hence the strong responses.
-Amber






More information about the New-imc mailing list