[New-imc] warning on choice of list names

[evan at protest.net]

I personaly think it would be more clear if they said imc-paris-new
instead. Because on the outermost general level it is an imc list, then it
relates to paris, then at the most focused level the new or reforming
process.

in solidarity,
evan

On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, boud wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>    There seems to be a suggestion by some IMC IDF people to
> create some new lists with the names
>
> new-imc-paris
> new-imc-france
>
> i don't think the proposition is very serious, but i pointed
> out on imc-france and listwork that these could lead to confusion
> with new-imc:
>
> http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/public/listwork/2002-July/002503.html
>
> i didn't cross-post here, but any comments should probably go to
> listwork and/or imc-france.
>
> boud
>
> _______________________________________________
> New-imc mailing list
> New-imc at lists.indymedia.org
> http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/new-imc
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Website: www.anarchogeek.com        PGP: www.anarchogeek.com/pgp.txt |
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| To be a militant is to resist, but to go "through and beyond         |
| resistance, in the collective construction and exercise of a counter |
| power capable of destructing the power of capitalism and opposing it |
| with an alternative program."                                -Empire |
------------------------------------------------------------------------