[New-imc] PROPOSAL: Changing the list for final approval of New IMCs

[Tony]

Hello All

I agree with Sheri's reasoning and think Communication would be a 
better place for these Applications.

Cheers tony

PS: i wish people would stop cc'ing every list - the 3 main lists 
(finance, process, and comms) are distinct.

Many people interested in Global indymedia are on all three lists, 
those that are not will hear of any relevant posts from their 
liasion. CC'ing all lists just causes confusion and makes replying a 
mess.

Please could we stick to one list for one subject - those that seem 
to over lap will still be dealt with.

Sorry to moan...

>hello everyone,
>
>Proposal:
>
>After new applications have passed through the new imc working group 
>and been approved without any concerns, I'd like to propose that 
>rather than sending these applications to imc-process for final 
>approval and discussion, that they be sent to imc-communication.
>
>Why?  Because imc-communication is truly more of a representative 
>list of liaisons and because of that there are more people on that 
>list from a larger set of local imcs.
>
>Purpose:  To bring the news of new imc applications to more of the 
>network as a whole and to do it through a liaison list rather a 
>discussion list.  At the time we set up this process, 
>imc-communication was not a liaison list and process was where we 
>put everything that had to do with imc network decision making.
>
>I'd propose that they be sent for a few months to both lists and 
>bring the communication and process lists up to speed with our 
>decision here and then phase out process and have the network 
>liaisons on communication learn about the new imcs being approved.
>
>if imc process list was more of a liaison list, i'd perhaps have a 
>different proposal.
>
>But the goal is to have the final approval happen on a list of 
>people acting as liaisons for all the imcs in the network.
>
>
>peace
>sheri
>