[New-imc] Re: Nick - Rogue IMC

[Jay]

Hi all,

I'll have time later tonight or tomorrow to respond a bit to the current 
"rogue" situation.  In the meantime, I think Nick should keep up with his 
position as volunteer.  As I see it, he has been able keep his head up 
through this situation, and I know he's been doing a lot of communicating 
off-list with the people involved, trying to explain points and keep 
conversations flowing.  When I gave a couple recommendations I didn't mean 
to seem as if I was stepping in or "taking over."  Though one person in the 
new-imc working group does generally "bottom-line" each new-imc's 
application, I think we can all work together as a group, especially in 
such complicated situations, to advise as things go along.

Like I said, more later.

Jay

At 4/22/2003, Arc wrote:
>Nick,
>
>I think given what's happened so far that it's important that you step
>back from IMC-Rogue and let someone more experienced deal with it.  It's
>one of those cases like a group has a series of really out of control
>meetings - you need an experienced facilitator at these times to help
>move the group forward.
>
>If IMC-Rogue was an IMC I was helping through the process, at this
>point, because of my inexperience and because some people's feelings of
>me would be making the issue worse, I would have to ask someone else to
>take on the project.
>
>Yes we need more volunteers helping out in new-imc, but this peticular
>one I think is beyond the scope of many of our abilities to deal with.
>I'm glad Jay has stepped in to attempt to resolve this.
>
>--
>
>Fascism (noun) A system of government that exercises a dictatorship of
>the extreme right, typically through the merging of state and business
>leadership, together with belligerent nationalism.
>  (From the American Heritage Dictionary, Houghton Mifflin Company, 1983)
>