[New-imc] IMC: Anarchists or Authoritarians?
Bill Huston
bhuston at mu.clarityconnect.net
Wed Feb 5 18:52:03 PST 2003
Thus spake boud:
> bill sent me an offlist email, so i won't quote his words,
>but since the issues are public issues, i will respond here
>on imc-binghamton and new-imc.
boud,
Your posting the contents of a private message to a public
forum is a rather gross breach of accepted internet ettiquette.
I'm generally all for openness, however, this does not mean that
any and all private communitations *should* be made public, without
the prior consent of all parties involved.
I've read and understand your feelings on the issue, and appreciate
these points:
o The decision on what parameters to set on an indy list ... are a
local decision for the local IMC.
o ... the new-imc working group has no power to force any new IMC
to even have a mailing list ...
o Indymedia is only Indymedia if it's ... non-hierarchical
And let me quote this once again from newimc.indymedia.org
(highlighting added):
The strength of the IMC as a concept comes directly from its
organizational structure; namely, a decentralized network of
**autonomous** collectives... we have local IMC's throughout the
world that are **autonomous** in their decision making...
IMC-Binghamton, being autonomous, has and should have the power
to make these decisions.
>bill, IMHO it would be much harder for local US people to see how
>the IMC Binghamton collective is organising if the list has secret
>archives.
There is a difference between "secret" and "non-public". There are
reasons why *for now*, this list will remain non-public, which I
discussed with you, and you should be understanding of. This is
and should be our right as an autonomous local IMC to establish
this policy as local needs dictate.
>There's also the global indymedia readership.
Information for global consumption will be posted on our main
site as stories and features.
>For obvious reasons, people around the world are very much angry
>with "the USA", and people thinking of starting an Indymedia group
>in West Asia, South Asia, ... might be very suspicious about Indymedia
>if they could not read the archives and see things for themselves...
You are reading much into this. I seriously doubt that anyone in West Asia
even knows Binghamton exists, nor cares about reading internal planning
by its members.
This brings up a question I have about editorial policy, which I will
provide in a seperate email.
Regards,
Bill Huston
More information about the New-imc
mailing list