[New-imc] Online form: Proposed new IMC! (housing.indymedia.org)
PseudoPunk
bart at indymedia.org
Thu Jan 2 07:15:03 PST 2003
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Chuck0 heeft geschreven:
> evan at protest.net wrote:
>
>> The idea of virtual topical imc's has come up again and again. And
>> everytime we have too repeat the very good arguments for why they are a
>> bad idea. Honestly i am quite surprised that Chuck0 proposed this. Do we
>> have to go through this again?
>>
>> -evan
>
>
> Refresh my memory on why they are a bad idea? Why does Indymedia have to
> take a hard line on IMCs being location-based? If we can put together a
> network of people to do this project in Indymedia fashion, then why
> should anybody else care?
>
> I think there is a real need for a non-local IMC dedicated to housing,
> homeless and economic justice issues. There is lots of good work being
> done by local IMC participants on these issues, but most of the housing
> activists remain unaware of what other groups and activists are doing.
> One exception might be OCAP, which does a good job of promoting itself.
> And it is difficult to find out what different cities are doing on these
> issues.
>
> There is already lots of content on this issue being posted to local
> IMCs. There are IMCistas out there who are writing on these issues. I
> think a subject-focused IMC like this would be a motivating project for
> many housing activists and DIY journalists interested on these issues.
>
> As far as groups are concerned, I think that local housing coalitions,
> homeless advocates, Homes not Jails, OCAP, KWRU, and other groups would
> be interested.
Chuck,
why a global project, housing.indy.org if all your examples are usa
related ?
besides, I think thematic/subject based imc's will kill the interest in
local imc's.
and climate was created before new-imc process ever started. Personally
I think they're not even open publishing. but lets not start that
discussion here.
Bart
>
> Chuck0
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> Personal homepage -> http://chuck.mahost.org/
> Infoshop.org -> http://www.infoshop.org/
> MutualAid.org -> http://www.mutualaid.org/
> Alternative Press Review -> http://www.altpr.org/
> Practical Anarchy Online -> http://www.practicalanarchy.org/
> Anarchy: AJODA -> http://www.anarchymag.org/
>
> "The state can't give you free speech, and the state can't take it away.
> You're born with it, like your eyes, like your ears. Freedom is
> something you assume, then you wait for someone to try to take it away.
> The degree to which you resist is the degree to which you are free..."
> ---Utah Phillips
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> New-imc mailing list. Lista de correo New-imc
> New-imc at lists.indymedia.org
> http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/new-imc
>
>
- --
What I can say is that Microsoft has enough cash on hand to pay 5,000
programmers to write free software for about a century. There is clearly
no need for the proprietary software model (RMS)
http://wvl.indymedia.org | bart at indymedia.org
http://thepits.be | bart at thepits.be
http://pseudopunk.be | icq: 48682266
gebruik vrije software -- Debian GNU/Linux -- http://debian.org
gpg --keyserver keys.indymedia.org --recv-keys be196251
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Debian - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQE+FCvLcu9TlCt+tnERAnUqAKDZ0/I2PezO2kuxtk1RYOd/jOKV4ACg0FY9
Yj7TE14dx3adtpr6U3T4ru0=
=v0Cy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the New-imc
mailing list