[IMC-Process] Re: [New-imc] Re: PROPOSAL chuck on approval list DEADLINE Wed 8 Jan 2003 17:00 GMT

[flow]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Allá por Sun, 5 Jan 2003 21:59:45 +0100 (CET)
boud <boud1 at wp.pl> contaba:

> hi chuck,
> 
> On Sun, 5 Jan 2003, Chuck0 wrote:
> 
> > By the way, boud, you posted this to new-imc, not imc-process. If
> > you are going to ban me from a list, at least send you proposal to
> > the right list.
> 
> The proposal has nothing to do with the imc-process list.
> 
> Please read the proposal carefully:
> http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/public/new-imc/2003-January/004418.html

I've been reading patiently imc-process and I think banning chuck is a
bad idea:
andy talks:
http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/public/imc-process/2003-January/004427.html
andy refers to chuck in a very bad way:
http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/public/imc-process/2003-January/004443.html
and chuck says:
http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/public/imc-process/2003-January/004445.html
andy writes to imc-process and new-imc:
http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/public/imc-process/2003-January/004450.html
http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/public/new-imc/2003-January/004407.html
so chuck replied-to-all:
http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/public/new-imc/2003-January/004408.html
http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/public/imc-process/2003-January/004451.html

So, this isnt something wrong with chuck, they should apologize

flow
- ---
sinDominio.net: Please visit our website to learn the facts about this
quality health product and view our absolute satisfaction guarantee 

1.Body Fat Loss
2.Wrinkle Reduction
3.Increased Energy Levels
4.Muscle Strength improvement
5.Increased Sexual Potency
6.Improved Emotional Stability
7.Better Memory

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+GLPk1CNaL0iqELURAjgPAJsGCn93GEJ3nRj9zhAH5Cl6P9d/3gCfUVgk
Ps41eOAFrU7qlZRXdk1Tt+U=
=KkdD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----