[New-imc] Lets Welcome Rogue to the Network

[Arc]

On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 12:28:23AM +0200, boud wrote:
> 
> Our de facto policy is about a relationship building process.
> Which includes trust. And i think IMC Rogue has clearly showed itself
> to have the maturity of dealing constructively with a conflict and
> has earned our trust. 

I'm curious, with several people expressing strong concerns about
"super-majority" fallbacks to consensus with new imc's, who do you
consider "our" to be?  I'm interpreting that as discounting opposition
as not being part of the group of people who have a voice in these
issues.  This concerns me greatly.

I don't think I could "trust" any IMC with a decidion making policy
which allows the kind of behavior we have seen in existing IMCs that
adopted a super-majority fallback.  I have already detailed this in a
previous email, I won't repeat it here.

Outreach was always a side issue compaired to the decidion making
policy, and I dont believe the decidion making policy has been
addressed to date.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.indymedia.org/pipermail/new-imc/attachments/20030520/e3a9ae4d/attachment.pgp