[Resolve] Re: [New-imc] rogue imc is officially on the cities list

[Arc]

On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 08:16:52PM -0400, Sarsnic at aol.com wrote:
> First a block of Rogue, then a block of the US process list?  Dang!  
> 
> There is a rule of consensus that is much more universal than "no
> voting ever" which is that people repeatedly blocking stuff are
> probably in the wrong organization.

We could probobally make a few dozen proposals that would be immediatly
blocked, would that make the group that blocked them wrong?

Blocks are not suppost to be nessesary, in a healthy social structure
they are not.  In a healthy structure people have a good idea where the
network stands, discusses stuff fully and publically in a non-combative
atmosphere, and "proposals" are only made to synthesis what it feels
everyone is wanting - vs our current system where people just "propose"
what they think would be a good idea and then a war of social pressure
begins to push the proposal through.  
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.indymedia.org/pipermail/new-imc/attachments/20030522/79aac584/attachment.pgp