[New-imc] Re: [Resolve] Out of control tech
Blicero
blicero at ecn.org
Thu May 22 06:27:08 PDT 2003
On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 02:07:59AM -0400, Arc wrote:
> On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 12:38:19PM +0200, PseudoPunk wrote:
> > >
> > > Somebody better step in here and help blicero regain control of himself
> > > before this situation gets much worse. With G8 comming up in a few days
> > > the last thing we need is a renegade tech with access to IMC resources.
> >
> > Honestly,
> > that description sounds more like a description of you.
>
> Blicero used his access to servers to put rogue-imc on the cities list
> against our process, in anger, and has been making threats that make me
against you process to process
> personally worried he might do something more extreme like remove
> ithaca's DNS or interfere with my email forward.
i don't have to explain you how ridicouolous you are sounding
people in this and other network know me sufficiently to make it useless to
argue more with you
>
> I have never, either through threat or action, used my access to IMC
> resources to gain power over other IMC members or to overrule process.
>
> The call to have blicero's access immediatly revoked is a to prevent
> more harm to be done in this situation until it cools down, and it is on
> a temporary basis only.
>
> Blicero has done some great work with audio in the past and is needed
> for his work in europe. Removing him as IMC-Tech would hurt the network
> as a whole, not to mention, is completely unnessesary. This isn't about
> personalities or who-likes-who and this isn't about kicking anyone out.
>
> The call to have his access revoked is not "punishment" for his actions,
> but as a precautionary measure. His uncontrolled anger, threats, and
> the action of adding rogue to the cities list without consensus and
> against established Indymedia process has indicated a clear and present
> need to protect our resources from further abuse.
>
> There is no need for the IMC-Tech clique to puff out their cheeks and
> "protect" blicero, this is not an attack on him, and this is not a
> popularity contest. Ego and power games are not what we're about.
you ahve some serious mental problem
.
--
ciao
blicero
More information about the New-imc
mailing list