[New-imc] What this leads to

[Andy Mulkerin]

Sorry for continuing the discussion on this list. I agree that it's not
really a matter for this list anymore. I'll try to keep track of it on
other lists.
solidarity
andy

---------------------------------------------------------
So grab a pen turn off the CNN and scratch me out some plans
to get together again.


http://pittsburgh.indymedia.org
http://www.subtext.info

On Thu, 22 May 2003, boud wrote:

> On Thu, 22 May 2003, Arc wrote:
>
> > On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 04:21:15PM +0200, boud wrote:
> > > It's clear that arc (and probably eric, both from IMC Ithaca) are
> > > unhappy with what is effectively a "consensus minus two (individuals)"
> > > network decision regarding IMC Rogue.
> >
> > ... Nowhere did we agree to use anything but
> > pure consensus within new-imc.
>
> Meta-meta-debate is risky, arc.
>
> Nowhere AFAIR did the new-imc working group make a consensus decision
> on an internal new-imc decision-making procedure.
>
> And the more that you show that full consensus is sometimes impractical,
> the less chance that people will implement it in their local IMCs.
>
> IMHO your comment is appropriate for imc-us-process, not new-imc.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> New-imc mailing list. Lista de correo New-imc
> New-imc at lists.indymedia.org
> http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/new-imc
>