[New-imc] What this leads to

[Arc]

On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 04:24:56PM -0400, Andy Mulkerin wrote:
> Sorry for continuing the discussion on this list. I agree that it's not
> really a matter for this list anymore. I'll try to keep track of it on
> other lists.

It is very much still an issue on this list.

The process for IMCs to become official is they must go through the
new-imc process, which finishes with a proposal for them to become
official with a 4-day window for new-imc volunteers to object, followed
by a 7-day window on imc-process.

Rogue went to imc-process and got several blocks, thus back to new-imc.
It remains in new-imc despite the gross abuse of power by some of the
imc-techs and will continue to be so until the issues surrounding it are
solved.  These issues cannot even be properly addressed while there are
personal attacks and abuses of power, and with this behavior apparently
happening with the approval of some of IMC-Rogue's members, that is
likely a very long road indeed.  
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.indymedia.org/pipermail/new-imc/attachments/20030522/433093df/attachment.pgp