[New-imc] Did Rogue adopt consensus?

[freedom]

My block of rogue's application was to be automatically dropped when rogue 
adopted an acceptable model of consensus decisionmaking (2/3 majority rule 
fall back when consensus is not reached is majority rule, not consensus).  
Did this happen?

If not, please consider the following:

Statements that if imc-ithaca can block rogue because it doesn't use  
consensus, then Huston can block if rogue does not have a 3/4 majority rule  
fall back are non-sense.  Indymedia does operate by consensus and that cannot 
be blocked.  It is an agreement that exists and can only be changed by 
consensus.  2/3 majority rule fall back is not part of any accepted model of 
consensus decisionmaking and so it is a blockable issue.

If Blicero acted on his own initiative he unwittingly did rogue a great  
disservice.  Rogue is much stronger as a result of the process it has gone  
through to become an imc than it would have been if issues had not been  
raised.  They are setting an example to follow regards recruitment.  If they  
also have gotten their process structures in as good shape as their  
recruitment, they are the imc that we will all look to to see how to do  
things the right way.  

My block of rogue had an automatic step-aside when a legitimate consensus 
model was adopted.  I trusted those working with rogue to deciding when that 
criteria was met, and did not hound the process.  The assistence I offered 
rogue was not asked for.

If we do not keep our agreements, if we are not trustworthy, if those with 
more power than others by virtue of control over lists, etc. act in an 
authoritarian manner, then Indymedia will fail.

Eric