[New-imc] PROPOSAL: removing arc from new-imc WG [deadline: 29 may 18 GMT]

[dragon]

I also posted a specific rationale questioning such a block, and received an
angry response back from arc that did not address at all the issues raised.
. .and I have no history with him.

Being new to the list, I do not feel so strongly about removing arc from the
list as others do, however judging from what I have seen, there is grounds
to do so and I support the proposal.

deva
pdx imc


 
> Monday, May 26, 2003, 4:31:41 PM, Sarsnic said:
> 
> Sac> I find it completely unacceptable for Arc to be part of this work
> group if he can not answer simple questions like this one about the
> explanation for his block. 
> Sac> - Nick
> 
> >>With which part of the following statement do you disagree (if any)?
> >>All IMCs that are implementing 2/3 fallbacks are not truly consensus
> based and therefore they are not in accord with the Principles of Unity. 
> It makes sense to start with the new-IMC applicants
> >>first, but eventually, any IMC that insists on a 2/3 fallback position
> must be purged from the cities list and no longer considered an IMC.
> Sac> _______________________________________________
> Sac> New-imc mailing list. Lista de correo New-imc
> Sac> New-imc at lists.indymedia.org
> Sac> http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/new-imc
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Mike
> mailto:micro.zen at verizon.net
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> New-imc mailing list. Lista de correo New-imc
> New-imc at lists.indymedia.org
> http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/new-imc
>