[New-imc] SF discussion off this list

[boud]

hi everyone,
  i agree with nick - new-imc is not the place for conflict resolution
(though the comment from petros for IMC Cyprus is certainly inspiring
:). When you have 10 active people in a city IMC and it wants to split
up, IMHO that's a political split for a group that needs to work
through a conflict resolution process, try to practice better
communication techniques and consensus-type decision-making etc. -
it's not a geographical split.

<imc-us-process at lists.indymedia.org> would be a good place
to discuss. If necessary, IMC SF can invite people from new-imc
to join in at imc-us-process.

http://docs.indymedia.org/view/Global/ConflictResolution
would be a good place to read about conflict resolution techniques.

solidarity
boud

PS: i also agree that imc-process is off-limits for SF conflict
resolution. 


On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 Sarsnic at aol.com wrote:

> I think that if anyone involved in the SF conflict feels the need to
> continue writing on any listservs other than sf listservs, it all
> needs to move to us-process.  It is inappropriate for this
> discussion to continue on new-imc as it is no longer about new-imc
> issues.  I would also beg all of you not to bring this conflict to
> the global process list, as we scare a bunch of participants off
> that list every time we have US English language email battles on
> that list.  That is why we set up us-process.  Of course it would be
> better if the conflict could be resolved in SF without needing to go
> to any global / national lists, my only point here is that we stop
> using the wrong lists for these types of things.

> Peace
> Nick
> _______________________________________________
> New-imc mailing list. Lista de correo New-imc
> New-imc at lists.indymedia.org
> http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/new-imc
>