[New-imc] san francisco

[Bht]

Oh my goodness.  Reading through these last two emails is hard work.

It appears that the SFBAY people have stated exactly what the SF people
have neglected in their agreement.  All that the SF people have done is
insinuate that things happened.  They also threatened to expose private
emails and such to back up their claims of threats and what not.

Looking at this on the computer, the SFBAY people are looking for the
terms of their agreement to be upheld.  Which includes:
1.  turning over ownership of indybay.org
2.  SF posting the blurb about the "expansion"

The SF people havent, that I have read, asked for anything except access
to the physical space to retrieve personal items.

Disregarding the personal sentiment in the emails, and addressing the
agreement and what it states, it seems clear(er) that the SF people are
delinquent on the agreement.

I dont know what "power" we have, but I would rather not see a flame war
going on various global lists about a US IMC.  Being that, I propose:

New-IMC requests that both collectives up hold the terms of the agreement.
SF IMC will:  hand over the dns indybay.org, and post the blurb.
SFBAY IMC will:  allow removal of personal items from the physical space.

Or something like that, short and to the point.  The personal issues are
not something that can be dealt with over email.  I kind of feel that this
will be overlooked and everything, because we havent even gotten into to
the second round of bickering about this.  Perhaps we wont need too.
bht