[New-imc] this list

[Kristen E. Kordecki]

Lisa,

New IMC people can't help.  We simply don't know the extent of the 
processes.  There a number of seasoned IMCers on this list, but the 
likelihood of being on a more appropriate list is high.  Like the Process 
list.

The New list may be where the disruption of domain names occurred, but this 
discussion is above the heads of a number of us and it I can't imagine why 
you would want new IMC volunteers/coordinators helping make these decisions.

Now, what does make sense to me, is to move this discussion to Process, 
deal with it, then based on the results, the Process will dictate how 
domain names are maintained/changed/edited/transformed/owned, etc. 
etc.  Then, the New list can adhere to the recommendations/decision Process 
makes in the future.  But right now, righting this perceived wrong (I'm not 
arguing either way) is something that doesn't apply to this list or fall 
within the ability of a number of us to help remedy.

But then again, what the hell do I know?

Cheers,
K

At 11:53 AM 1/7/2004 -0800, you wrote:
>Hello New-IMC,
>
>I also agree that this discussion does not belong
>here. It was never my intention of disrupting this
>list by posting the mediation agreement.
>
>What does concern me however, is that a new IMC was
>approved, and was given another groups domain name:
>sf.indymedia.org
>
>I do have an issue with this. Basically, our IMC site
>was taken from our collective, and now people on this
>list are telling us there is nothing anyone in
>Indymedia can do. Well, I don't believe that. I don't
>think it is right, or fair to the Bay Area community
>or all the people that have put in time working on
>sf.indymedia.org.
>
>Where Indymedia domain names are pointed is a global
>Indymedia network decision. This is not something we
>can work out on a local level. Perhaps we need to find
>a new process to deal with disputed domain names?
>
>Again, I do not think a flame war should happen on
>this list... but, to just send the discussion to
>us-process is not going to solve anything either. I
>still contend that the new San Francisco IMC
>application should be voided, and the domain
>sf.indymedia.org should be returned to *everyone* it
>was originally given to.
>
>Thank you for your time and patience with us.
>
>Lisa
>
>__________________________________
>Do you Yahoo!?
>Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes
>http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus
>_______________________________________________
>New-imc mailing list. Lista de correo New-imc
>New-imc at lists.indymedia.org
>http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/new-imc

Articles are due JANUARY 15th
to: muddy_media at yahoo.com

Guidelines
Appx. 500 words
Use quotes and references
Send digital photos if possible
Avoid editorials

This issue is focused on economics

We also like political poetry,
political cartoons, political crosswords
book and magazine reviews, etc. etc.  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.indymedia.org/pipermail/new-imc/attachments/20040107/32db8b47/attachment.html