[New-imc] PROPOSAL new application sponsoring rule DEADLINE Mon 12 Jan 2004 10:00 GMT

[Pseudo Punk]

Mike R <micro.zen at verizon.net> wrote:
> Reviewing the message trail of how the sf.indymedia.org proposal
> passed
> http://lists.indymedia.org/pipermail/new-imc/2003-November/004633.html
> it did pass ususually.  There was no declared sponsor for the
> collective.  The new-imc working group member who championed it was
> Gekked, who is a member of the new applying collective.  He set the
> deadline and also sent the message to imc-process that the proposed
> imc passed. 

> In order to avoid this sort of conflict of interest in the future, I
> propose that all IMC application have a sponsor who is not a member of
> the applying collective.
> 
> This is a forward-looking proposal and cannot apply retroactively.

i don't mind your proposal but it won't change much ...
Bart


> -- 
>  Mike
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> New-imc mailing list. Lista de correo New-imc
> New-imc at lists.indymedia.org
> http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/new-imc
> 
> 

-- 
&"éçà'!é&"àéç"'!à'(!ç"'¶è"'(!"'à(!"à¶ç!"à(!éà!'éàç(!à¶èé"'

http://wvl.indymedia.org  |     bart at indymedia.org
http://thepits.be         |     bart at thepits.be
http://pseudopunk.be

gebruik vrije software -- Debian GNU/Linux -- http://debian.org
gpg --keyserver keys.indymedia.org --recv-keys be196251