[New-imc] PROPOSAL new application sponsoring rule DEADLINE Mon 12 Jan 2004 10:00 GMT

[clara]

i support this,

but in general I think that proposal that doesn't have an immediate urgency 
should have a deadline of at least a week.

love and solidarity,
clara


At 01:07 8-1-2004, Mike R wrote:
>Reviewing the message trail of how the sf.indymedia.org proposal
>passed
>http://lists.indymedia.org/pipermail/new-imc/2003-November/004633.html
>it did pass ususually.  There was no declared sponsor for the
>collective.  The new-imc working group member who championed it was
>Gekked, who is a member of the new applying collective.  He set the
>deadline and also sent the message to imc-process that the proposed
>imc passed.
>
>In order to avoid this sort of conflict of interest in the future, I
>propose that all IMC application have a sponsor who is not a member of
>the applying collective.
>
>This is a forward-looking proposal and cannot apply retroactively.
>
>--
>  Mike
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>New-imc mailing list. Lista de correo New-imc
>New-imc at lists.indymedia.org
>http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/new-imc