[New-imc] PROPOSAL new application sponsoring rule DEADLINEMon 12 Jan 2004 (fwd)

[meghan at ucimc.org]

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 10:45:27 -0500
From: valentine V eben <vally_x at lycos.com>
Reply-To: vally_x at mailcity.com
To: meghan at ucimc.org
Subject: Re: [New-imc]  PROPOSAL new application sponsoring rule
    DEADLINEMon 12 Jan 2004

I support this too.
Sphinx
--

--------- Original Message ---------

DATE: Thu, 8 Jan 2004 09:39:25
From: meghan at ucimc.org
To: Mike R <micro.zen at verizon.net>
Cc: new-imc at lists.indymedia.org

>i support this.
>
>On Wed, 7 Jan 2004, Mike R wrote:
>
>> Reviewing the message trail of how the sf.indymedia.org proposal
>> passed
>> http://lists.indymedia.org/pipermail/new-imc/2003-November/004633.html
>> it did pass ususually.  There was no declared sponsor for the
>> collective.  The new-imc working group member who championed it was
>> Gekked, who is a member of the new applying collective.  He set the
>> deadline and also sent the message to imc-process that the proposed
>> imc passed.
>>
>> In order to avoid this sort of conflict of interest in the future, I
>> propose that all IMC application have a sponsor who is not a member of
>> the applying collective.
>>
>> This is a forward-looking proposal and cannot apply retroactively.
>>
>> --
>>  Mike
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> New-imc mailing list. Lista de correo New-imc
>> New-imc at lists.indymedia.org
>> http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/new-imc
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>New-imc mailing list. Lista de correo New-imc
>New-imc at lists.indymedia.org
>http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/new-imc
>



____________________________________________________________
Get advanced SPAM filtering on Webmail or POP Mail ... Get Lycos Mail!
http://login.mail.lycos.com/r/referral?aid=27005