[New-imc] PROPOSAL new application sponsoring rule DEADLINE Mon 12 Jan 2004 10:00 GMT

[Mike R]

Hi clara & Bart,

There is no urgency on the proposal & we can extend the deadline.  how
is

 DEADLINE Wed 28 Jan 2004 17:00 GMT

??

Also, the proposal won't change much but will prevent a working group
member from rushing through a personal application.

-Mike

Thursday, January 08, 2004, 5:16:31 AM, clara said:

c> i support this,

c> but in general I think that proposal that doesn't have an immediate urgency 
c> should have a deadline of at least a week.

c> love and solidarity,
c> clara


c> At 01:07 8-1-2004, Mike R wrote:
>>Reviewing the message trail of how the sf.indymedia.org proposal
>>passed
>>http://lists.indymedia.org/pipermail/new-imc/2003-November/004633.html
>>it did pass ususually.  There was no declared sponsor for the
>>collective.  The new-imc working group member who championed it was
>>Gekked, who is a member of the new applying collective.  He set the
>>deadline and also sent the message to imc-process that the proposed
>>imc passed.
>>
>>In order to avoid this sort of conflict of interest in the future, I
>>propose that all IMC application have a sponsor who is not a member of
>>the applying collective.
>>
>>This is a forward-looking proposal and cannot apply retroactively.
>>
>>--
>>  Mike
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>New-imc mailing list. Lista de correo New-imc
>>New-imc at lists.indymedia.org
>>http://lists.indymedia.org/mailman/listinfo/new-imc



-- 
Mike
mailto:micro.zen at verizon.net